If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.
While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In safe distance to live from cell phone tower , psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.