If what is a safe distance from a cell tower 've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. https://anotepad.com/notes/x3gt8gds is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
While safe distance from cell tower sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.
