Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell System?

If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause issues for users.


It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

what is a safe distance from a cell tower  does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.