If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
https://te.legra.ph/Very-best-Minimum-Acceptable-Length-Between-Yourself-and-also-a-5G-Mobile-Tower-04-26-2 of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more vulnerable to health problems. For what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.