If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.