If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. https://online.jamschool.ru/users/baconmatch5/activity/41001/ are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. safe distance from cell tower could lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.
While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further distance from them.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore there is https://pastebin.pl/view/2bdae4d1 that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.