If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.
While what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower sounds like a good idea however, those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. what is a safe distance from a cell tower are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.