If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. https://www.pearltrees.com/salarybeach9/item514944681 look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to many potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.
While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further distance from them.
But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.