If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
safe distance from cell tower for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for safe distance from cell tower exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.