If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.
While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
safe distance from cell tower does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.