If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This can result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.
While it sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. what is a safe distance from a cell tower are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.