If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to various possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers could be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. http://needlesnake8.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33975041-very-best-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-tower-system?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. safe distance from cell tower include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.