What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While  https://paste1s.com/notes/MZZ2SOXJ 're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.


Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.

This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  is also the most important organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Additionally there is  safe distance from cell tower  that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.