What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If  Click for more 've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

They are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices.  Hop over to this website  are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.



The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.