If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.
Since safe distance from cell tower is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in various possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good however, people who live close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. safe distance from cell tower is also the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.